Marketplace MegaFail Inflation Edition

On May 1, 2013, “Marketplace” aired a segment about inflation.  The show extolled the many benefits of “a little more inflation.”  This is a Marketplace MegaFail inflation edition. Titled “Should we bring inflation back from the dead?,” reporter David Gura listed these benefits from just a touch more inflation:

  1. Housing prices would rise and fewer homeowners would find their houses underwater.[1]
  2.  Those who have borrowed to, say, buy a car would get to pay back their loans with cheaper dollars.[2]
  3. “Companies could raise prices, that could lead to higher salaries, ‘and assuming they can control their costs, that could be beneficial to their profit margins; that could be beneficial to them expanding their business, creating jobs; that could be beneficial to their shareholders.’ “[3]

Frankly, these statements are incredibly stupid.  Inflation means prices and incomes are rising at about the same rate.  Any increase in salaries will just keep pace with inflation, leaving the consumer with unchanged purchasing power.  The only way people who borrow can pay back with cheaper dollars is if the inflation is a complete surprise.  If the inflation is expected, it will be part of the interest rate on the loan.  Finally, higher housing prices?  Give me a break.  Even if housing prices rose, the real net wealth in your house wouldn’t change much because the higher price level would eat up the price increase.

This morning, Kai Ryssdal was a guest on KQED’s Forum program.  He proudly declared that Marketplace did not employ any MBA’s or economics Ph.D.’s.  After this embarrassment, perhaps Mr. Ryssdal should reconsider his hiring policy.  Or at least talk to economists who know what they’re talking about.  We’re not that hard to find.

(I suspect Marketplace will be removing this story from their website soon.  As a public service, you can click here to get a pdf version of the transcript.)

[1] From the transcript, quoted from David Blanchflower, the Bruce V. Rauner Professor of Economics at Dartmouth College.

[2] From the transcript, quoted from Kevin Jacques, the Boynton D. Murch Chair in Finance at Baldwin Wallace University.

[3] Another priceless gem from Prof. Jacques, see footnote 2 above.

, , , , , , , , , ,

  1. #1 by Tony Lima on May 3, 2013 - 8:10 pm

    You are an idiot. Go learn some economics — you can learn a lot by reading my blog — and come back when you’re ready to play with the professionals.

(will not be published)

  • The Newsletter Signup

    The e-mail newsletter signup is temporarily disabled. If you're interested, please e-mail me directly.
  • Follow GonzoEcon on Twitter
  • GonzoEcon History


    • Tariffs for the Long Haul[1] April 4, 2015
      To get around the 25 percent tariff, Ford installs rear windows, rear seats, and seat belts prior to shipping the vehicles to the United States. These vehicles are no longer classified as commercial trucks but as passenger vehicles, which are subject to the much lower 2.5 percent tariff. Upon arrival in Baltimore, Maryland, the rear […]
    • Bay Area Air Quality District Proposes Violation of Constitution March 24, 2015
      A quick scan of BAAQMD's massive report shows a lot of concern for concentrations of various pollutants in different locations, but zero consideration of sources. Frankly, that's stupid. BAAQMD cannot determine the effectiveness of their regulations until they know the percentage of current pollution emitted by exempt structures. Until then they are simply whistling in […]
    • Tax Policy and Economic Growth March 5, 2015
      The point I’d like to add is that the U.S. has already done this once. In the 1970s, led by Cornell Professor Alfred E. Kahn, several important industries were deregulated: airlines, trucking, transportation generally, energy, communications (remember the old AT&T monopoly?), and finance (including banking). Each of these industries lowered prices, increased quantity offered and […]
    • Global Interest Rates Update February 28, 2015
      What, then, is the meaning of the expected change in the exchange rate, the term on the right side of the = sign? The Greek euro cannot depreciate against the German euro. In this case, we are measuring the default risk premium of the various countries.
I support error 451 - link opens in new window
Powered by Netfirms
Better Tag Cloud